Oh dear, how “beeeeep”

I do predicted that the quality of this blog will fall vertiginously, just after the decision to let VF comment freely.Seems that you don’t need an exact mathematical model to do predictions that are verified, factually, in a relatively short time. All you need, is to know your man

distortions

People that followed the exchanges with Fleury in this blog know that he is prone to misread, misunderstand and act on the basis of what he understands, not what was said/written. The more funny episode being the one of Pitx1, where he misread, misunderstood, didn’t read the central paper discussed and when he did accused [...]

à VF et AR, le 3 octobre 2007 22:08:54 HAEC

M. Vincent Fleury,
I just got complaints from my colleague signing her contributions on the Net by the pseudonym “Agathi” that you continue your postings at the comments of her blog. You’ve being told already that she doesn’t wish any contact with you.
Sometime ago we had the same problem occurring between you and me, with you [...]

VF_MF

Je viens de faire un nouveau dossier dans “Vincent Fleury”, nommé “mauvaise foi”, pour y consigner les exemples qu’il donne. En voici un joliment illustré :

mauvaise foi affichée :-)

A fréquenter des gens de “mauvaise foi” peut-on développer de la “mauvaise foi” ? l’attraper comme une maladie infectieuse ? Probablement, ce qui rend Vincent Fleury infréquentable, déjà affecté au point de pouvoir fréquenter Jean Staune sans crainte de l’attraper.
Accuser quelqu’un de mauvaise foi sans en apporter la preuve ne serait pas très seyant [...]